Legal Ethics and Procedural Integrity: Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Landmark Ruling on Affidavits

In a significant development, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued a directive that reshapes role of advocates in affirming their clients’ factual assertions. On May 14, 2025, a bench comprising Justice Vivek Rusia and Justice Gajendra Singh ruled

Continue ReadingLegal Ethics and Procedural Integrity: Madhya Pradesh High Court’s Landmark Ruling on Affidavits

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Pedestrian Rights: A Step Towards Safer, Accessible Urban Mobility

TSupreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment underscoring the right to walk on unobstructed footpaths as an essential part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution This pivotal ruling places pedestrian safety – especially for persons

Continue ReadingSupreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Pedestrian Rights: A Step Towards Safer, Accessible Urban Mobility

Supreme Court Issues Notice to Uttarakhand Government Officials Over Alleged Contempt in Waqf Property Demolition

The Supreme Court of India issued a notice to officials of the Uttarakhand Government in response to a contempt petition alleging the demolition of a registered Waqf property. The petition contends that this action violated a statement made by the Union Government

Continue ReadingSupreme Court Issues Notice to Uttarakhand Government Officials Over Alleged Contempt in Waqf Property Demolition

Supreme Court’s 2025 Action Plan: Tackling 7.24 Lakh Criminal Appeals Across High Courts

In a transformative step to combat India’s growing judicial backlog, the Supreme Court on May 10, 2025, issued a series of strategic recommendations to all High Courts aimed at clearing the staggering 7.24 lakh pending criminal appeals. The directive forms part of a broader national judicial reform agenda

Continue ReadingSupreme Court’s 2025 Action Plan: Tackling 7.24 Lakh Criminal Appeals Across High Courts

Supreme Court Examines PIL Seeking Shift from 5-Year to 4-Year LL.B Course in Line with NEP 2020

On May 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of India heard a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the current 5-year integrated Bachelor of Laws (LL.B) program. The petition urges the judiciary to direct the Central Government and Bar Council of India (BCI) to restructure the course into

Continue ReadingSupreme Court Examines PIL Seeking Shift from 5-Year to 4-Year LL.B Course in Line with NEP 2020

Supreme Court Holds Preliminary Hearing on Petitions Challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 – Key Takeaways from May 5 Session

ndia conducted a preliminary hearing on a batch of petitions questioning the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025. A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar,

Continue ReadingSupreme Court Holds Preliminary Hearing on Petitions Challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 – Key Takeaways from May 5 Session

Supreme Court of India Annuls JSW Steel’s ₹19,700 Crore Acquisition of Bhushan Power & Steel: A Legal and Structural Analysis

On May 2, 2025, the Supreme Court of India issued a landmark judgment that shook the foundations of the country’s insolvency resolution framework. The apex court annulled JSW Steel’s ₹19,700 crore acquisition of Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. (BPSL),

Continue ReadingSupreme Court of India Annuls JSW Steel’s ₹19,700 Crore Acquisition of Bhushan Power & Steel: A Legal and Structural Analysis

Understanding Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Judicial Interference and Arbitral Autonomy

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was enacted to provide an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that is efficient, cost-effective, and less time-consuming compared to traditional litigation. Section 34 of the Act delineates the grounds on which a party can challenge an arbitral award before a court. Over time, judicial interpretations have emphasized the principle of minimal judicial interference, underscoring the autonomy of arbitral tribunals.

Continue ReadingUnderstanding Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Judicial Interference and Arbitral Autonomy