The Supreme Court in its recent judgement Ashok Versus State of Uttar Pradesh, laid down guidelines for lawyers, prosecutors to provide free and compulsory legal aid to the accused, ensuring a fair trial and safeguarding the fundamental rights enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India

In the case of Suresh Chandra Tiwari & Anr. Versus State of Uttarakhand, this appeal challenges the conviction for murder of the accused persons with respect to the claim of recovery of some incriminating materials in connection with the purported recovery statement made under section

In the case between Indore Vikas Praadhikaran (IDA) & Anr. Vs Shri Humud Jain Samaj Trust & Anr., the case revolves around a tender notice that was issued by the Indore Development Authority(“IDA”) on July 17, 2020 for lease of land at the rate of ₹21,120 per square meter…

In the case between Hetram @ Babli Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., the case revolves around an appeal filed by an accused against the High Court’s decision to uphold a summoning application under Section 319 of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”), which was based solely on

In the case between Mahesh Damu Khare Vs. The State of Maharashtra, the case arose out of a relationship that apparently existed between the complainant and the appellant for a period of 10 years during which the woman accused the man of having had sexual intercourse with her on

In the case between National Health Authority vs M S Intermarc, the case revolves around a contractual dispute where the appellant had issued a tender for the renovation of its office, awarding the contract to the respondent for Rs. 3,14,95,840/- with an 80-day completion deadline, subject to liquidated

In the case between Punita Bhatt Alias Punita Dhawan vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (“BSNL”) New Delhi Thru. Its Chairman Cum Managing Director And 3 Others, the case in question pertains to the compassionate appointment of a widowed daughter to her deceased father’s office

In the case of Prashant V. State of NCT of Delhi, the complainant filed a FIR, saying that the appellant sexually exploited her under the false promise of marriage and forcibly engaged in sexual contact with her. She also claimed that the appellant had threatened to harm her family if she continued to have

The Sale Deed Executed In 2003 Does Not Require The State’s Prior Consent Under The Rajasthan Colonization Act, Which Expired In 1991

In the case of Satyendra Singh versus state of Uttar Pradesh & Anr, the case involves a government employee, the Assistant Commissioner in the Commercial Tax Department, was subjected to disciplinary action for alleged misconduct in the past while serving as an officer