In the case, Arjun s/o Ratan Gaikwad vs the state of Maharashtra and Ors, the Supreme Court observed that preventive detention is a harsh action, which cannot be invoked against every slight breach of peace. Instead, the power can be invoked only when the proposed detainee’s action tends to disrupt

The Supreme Court, in the case of Kirpal Singh vs Government Of India, has addressed the issue of the applicability of section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to the proceedings of arbitration. In this case, the appellant had incorrectly filed an appeal against the arbitral award before the High Court….

The case Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. The Constitution of M/s ECI SPIC SMO MCML is a significant legal case that emerged from a complex dispute involving railway infrastructure, contractual obligations, and judicial interpretation of administrative and contractual

The Supreme court in the case of Rohit Kochhar vs. Vipul Infrastructure Developers Ltd. & Ors., upheld the decision of a division bench of the Delhi High Court that a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell should be filed only in a court within whose…

The Case of Ramakant Ambalal Choksi vs Harish Ambalal Choksi & Others emphasize the difficulties in overseeing financial agreements in a family firm. In this case, brothers argue over unfair approach to business funds and claimed breaking of family agreement

In the case of Saba Simran vs. Union of India & Ors, The woman had been carrying the gold jewellery with her while returning to India from Dubai. Upon arrival, the Customs Department seized her jewellery, claiming that it integrated an import and thus, was subject to duty

In the case of Parvez Ahmed vs Directorate of Enforcement, the Enforcement Case Information Report (“ECIR”) dated 21.09.2022 is based on an National investment agency (“NIA”) First information report (“FIR”) alleging that the Popular Front of India (“PFI”) and its members

In case between Mohamed Asaruthin vs State of Tamil Nadu, the case revolves around the rejection of statutory bail applications by accused individuals, who argued that their right to bail accrued upon the expiration of the statutory period, despite the prosecution’s timely filing of extension applications

In the case between X Versus State of Rajasthan, the case involved an appeal filed by a rape victim challenging the High Court’s order granting bail to the accused based on alleged discrepancies in the victim’s FIR and Section 164 of the code of criminal procedure (“CrPC”) statement…