On 8th April 2025, the Supreme Court of India made a significant development regarding the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, by deferring the hearing on the challenges brought against the Act. The hearing, which had been eagerly awaited, was adjourned to
On April 7, 2025, the Supreme Court of India addressed multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The Act, which received Presidential assent on April 5, 2025, has been a subject of intense debate and legal scrutiny.
The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark verdict granting bail to activist Shoma Kanti Sen, who has been at the center of the controversial Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. This decision has sparked widespread debate, reflecting the delicate balance between
The Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment in the case of Pradip N. Sharma v. State of Gujarat, granting anticipatory bail to a former IAS officer accused of misusing his official position in land allotment matters. This ruling has not only garnered attention for its implications on anticipatory bail but also raised important questions about the limits of custodial interrogation in cases involving official misconduct. In this blog, we will analyze the key aspects of the judgment, its legal significance, and its potential impact on future cases of a similar nature.
The Supreme Court of India, in a significant judgment, ruled in favor of Amresh Shrivastava, a former Tehsildar, setting aside a chargesheet that had been delayed by 14 years. This case raises critical questions about the impact of prolonged delays in departmental proceedings and their legality.
The Supreme Court of India delivered a pivotal judgment in the case of Gastrade International vs. Commissioner of Customs, Kandla. These ruling addresses critical issues concerning customs duties and import regulations, particularly the classification of imported goods
The Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment in the case of Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat & Anr., marking a critical turning point in the legal landscape surrounding free speech and expression in India. In a move that has garnered widespread attention
The Supreme Court of India has delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat, which has far-reaching implications for freedom of speech, expression, and the role of the police in protecting constitutional rights. In this case, the court quashed the First Information Report (FIR) filed against Congress Rajya Sabha MP Imran Pratapgarhi, who had shared a poem titled "ऐ खून के प्यासे बात सुनो..." (translating to "O Thirsty for Blood, Listen...") on social media. The judgment highlights the delicate balance between free expression and law enforcement and reiterates the importance of safeguarding the fundamental right to dissent in a democratic society.
The Supreme Court of India delivered an important judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 1318 of 2025: Ramesh Kumaran vs. State Through the Inspector of Police, which sheds light on the conduct of legal professionals in the courtroom. This ruling is significant not just for the case
On March 26, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in a corruption-related case, highlighting its stance on the proper procedural conduct for handling criminal cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The judgment reversed a controversial decision by the Madras High Court that had quashed criminal proceedings against G. Easwaran, a former Assistant Director with the Nagercoil Local Planning Authority. Easwaran had been accused of possessing disproportionate assets, a charge punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.