The Supreme Court of India in the landmark case Jit Vinayak Arolkar versus State of Goa & ors, the heart of the dispute is a property known as “capnivoril guera,” and registered in the Land Registration Office of Bardez. The legal conflict arose between the appellant and the respondent…

The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark case of Atul Tiwari v. Regional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, has reinforced the fundamental principle that “just compensation” in motor accident cases is a right, not a privilege. This significant judgment emphasizes the need for courts to

In the landmark case of Gopi Krishan & Ors.vs Daulat Ram& Ors, the Supreme Court of India has delivered a significant judgment that brings much-needed clarity to the interpretation of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The case addresses a fundamental question in testamentary law

The Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment in the case of Muskan Enterprises & Anr. versus The State of Punjab & Anr, addressing crucial questions regarding the interpretation and implementation of Good and Service Tax (“GST”) notifications. The dispute originated when Appellant

In the case between New Jai Hind Transport Service vs Union of India, the Uttarakhand High Court stressed in a landmark decision that, in accordance with Section 15 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (“CGST”) Act, 2017, the value of free gasoline supplied by a service provider cannot

In the case of Basavaraj versus Indira and others, highlights the importance of careful pleading and the limitations on amending pleadings, particularly in cases involving compromise decrees. The dispute arose from a family land. Respondents filed a suit for partition of ancestral property

The Chhattisgarh High Court in the case of Neelkanth @ Neelu Nagesh vs. State of Chhattisgarh, handed down a historic ruling that addressed horrendous acts that tremble conscience of society. The ruling highlights the legal loopholes pertaining to crimes against deceased people in addition

In the case of Bijoy kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna & Anr. in February 2006, the complainant, lent Rs. 7,00,000 through a bearer cheque and subsequently Rs. 1,45,000 in cash to the accused. In repayment, the accused issued a cheque for Rs. 8,45,000 drawn on the account of Shilabati Hospital

In the case between M/S Arif Azim Co Ltd v. M/S Aptech Ltd, in an effort to establish India as a center for arbitration, Indian superior courts have approved the strict timelines for the several phases of arbitration procedures. Safeguards must be put in place, nevertheless, to