Recent Judgements
In the case of Bijoy kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna & Anr. in February 2006, the complainant, lent Rs. 7,00,000 through a bearer cheque and subsequently Rs. 1,45,000 in cash to the accused. In repayment, the accused issued a cheque for Rs. 8,45,000 drawn on the account of Shilabati Hospital
In the case between M/S Arif Azim Co Ltd v. M/S Aptech Ltd, in an effort to establish India as a center for arbitration, Indian superior courts have approved the strict timelines for the several phases of arbitration procedures. Safeguards must be put in place, nevertheless, to
The case of Zeeshan Haider v. Directorate of Enforcement is a significant legal dispute that highlights the intricate relationship between individual rights and enforcement agencies in India. Due to the seriousness of the allegations, lower courts originally rejected the…
In case Navratan Lal Sharma versus Radha Mohan Sharma & Ors. said the details in the initiated the between the two parties compromise, which was recorded by the court under Order 23 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code (“CPC”), 1908 . However, one of the parties did not follow the terms
In the case of Apurva @ Apurvo Bhuvanbabu Mandal v. Dolly & Ors., the original Family Court order awarded the wife (respondent) a monthly support payment of Rs.6,000/- and Rs.3,000/- for each child. The Gujarat High Court increased the maintenance payment to Rs.1 lakh…
The case of Jayedeepsinh Pravinsinh Chavda & Ors. Versus State of Gujarat addresses Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”) which was brought in 1983. In order to address the serious problem of married women treated with cruelty by their husbands or family members and their relative
In the case between Kabir Shankar Bose vs. State of West Bengal & Ors., the petitioner, under Article 32 of the Indian constitution, challenges the impartiality of the investigation being conducted by the local police on the ground of heightened political tension between two opposing parties
In the case, Arjun s/o Ratan Gaikwad vs the state of Maharashtra and Ors, the Supreme Court observed that preventive detention is a harsh action, which cannot be invoked against every slight breach of peace. Instead, the power can be invoked only when the proposed detainee’s action tends to disrupt
The Supreme Court, in the case of Kirpal Singh vs Government Of India, has addressed the issue of the applicability of section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to the proceedings of arbitration. In this case, the appellant had incorrectly filed an appeal against the arbitral award before the High Court….
The case Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. The Constitution of M/s ECI SPIC SMO MCML is a significant legal case that emerged from a complex dispute involving railway infrastructure, contractual obligations, and judicial interpretation of administrative and contractual
The Supreme court in the case of Rohit Kochhar vs. Vipul Infrastructure Developers Ltd. & Ors., upheld the decision of a division bench of the Delhi High Court that a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell should be filed only in a court within whose…
