Home > Recent Judgements > Supreme Court of India’s Consideration of Petitions Challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025
April 08, 2025
Supreme Court of India’s Consideration of Petitions Challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025
On April 7, 2025, the Supreme Court of India addressed multiple petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The Act, which received Presidential assent on April 5, 2025, has been a subject of intense debate and legal scrutiny.
Urgent Listing of Petitions
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Maulana Arshad Madani, President of Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, sought an urgent hearing of the petition. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna inquired about the oral mentioning, emphasizing the existing system for urgent listings via email. Sibal confirmed that a mentioning letter had been submitted, leading the Chief Justice to state that the matter would be reviewed later that afternoon.
Key Provisions Under Scrutiny
The petitions challenge several provisions of the Amendment Act on grounds of unconstitutionality and infringement on religious autonomy:
- Definition and Scope: The Act alters the definition of “Waqf,” potentially diluting its religious significance.
- Creation of Waqf: New conditions, such as demonstrating at least five years of practicing Islam, are introduced for establishing a Waqf, which some argue contradicts traditional Islamic practices.
- Management and Governance: The Act proposes changes in the composition of Waqf management bodies, including the inclusion of non-Muslim members, raising concerns about interference in religious affairs.
- Tribunal Decisions: The Amendment allows appeals against Waqf Tribunal decisions to High Courts, whereas previously, such decisions were final, potentially prolonging legal disputes.
Political and Religious Responses
The Amendment has elicited strong reactions from various political and religious entities:
- Indian Union Muslim League (IUML): Filed a writ petition, labeling the Act as an “unconstitutional assault on the religious autonomy and personal rights” of the Muslim community.
- Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK): Challenged the Act, stating it affects the rights of approximately 20 crore Muslims nationwide.
- Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind: Criticized the Amendment as unconstitutional and undemocratic, arguing it infringes upon the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Constitution.
Government’s Position
The government justifies the Amendment as a measure to enhance transparency, address mismanagement, and modernize the administration of Waqf properties. However, critics argue that the changes impose arbitrary restrictions and increase state control, deviating from the religious essence of Waqf.
Looking Ahead
The Supreme Court’s forthcoming examination of these petitions will be pivotal in determining the balance between legislative reforms and the protection of religious freedoms. The Court’s decision will have significant implications for the governance of Waqf properties and the autonomy of religious communities in India.
Related Developments
In related news, the Supreme Court has deferred hearings on petitions challenging the validity of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, to a three-judge bench. The Act mandates that the religious character of a place of worship be maintained as it existed on August 15, 1947. The Court expressed concerns over the numerous interim applications filed in the case, stating, “There is a limit to which petitions can be filed.”
These developments underscore the Court’s active role in addressing significant legal and social issues in India.
For more information or queries, please email us at
enquiries@chandrawatpartners.com
