Home  >Insights  > Bci’s Directive On The Use Of National Titles For Moot Courts: A Step Towards Transparency And Integrity

 Oct 17, 2024

BCI’S DIRECTIVE ON THE USE OF NATIONAL TITLES FOR MOOT COURTS: A STEP TOWARDS TRANSPARENCY AND INTEGRITY

The Bar Council of India (“BCI”) recently issued a significant directive aimed at private law universities and institutions that host moot court competitions. The BCI imposed the ban against the use of prefixes that are above the state level, whether “Bhartiya,” “National” or “Indian”, to avoid vagueness and dishonesty, and reinforce clarity. The BCI’s position does not leave itself out with its scope, as it must comply with the provisions of the Exemptions and Titles (Prohibition of Unfair Use) Act 1950, which makes certain terms concerning the use of government support illegal without its central government approval.

THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE DIRECTIVE

In recent years, several institutions have been conducting moot court competitions or other legal events using terms like “All India” or “National,” despite lacking the requisite authority. This has led to the public as well as participants believing that these events have Government sponsorship or that these events are legitimate National events. That other institutions have also used these names to fraudulently obtain sponsorships on the grounds of hosting these Moot Court competitions, which has brought needless abuse to the purity of top competitions.

The BCI’s directive serves for the implementation of these practices so covering the use of such titles only to those institutions which have the required authority or are affiliated with the government. Possessing a circular, such rules treat the national prefixes of these events poorly; which may persuade the participants that these are official events sanctioned by the government.

Legal Framework: The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950

The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 forms the legal basis for this directive.

  • Section 3 of the Act prohibits individuals or organizations from using names like “India,” “Indian,” “National,” “Bharat,” “Bhartiya,” or any name suggesting government support for professional or commercial purposes without prior approval from the Central Government.
  • Section 4 further prohibits the registration of entities that contravene these provisions.

This law aims to prevent the misuse of terms that imply governmental or national significance unless explicit permission is granted.

THE SCOPE OF THE DIRECTIVE

The BCI’s directive does not apply across the board to all institutions. There is a fundamental distinction between private law institutions and the National Law Universities or central or state universities.

National law University “NLU” s and government-affiliated universities may continue using terms like “National” for their competitions, provided they inform the Central Government beforehand to ensure transparency. These limitations though do not apply to the BCI as a statutory body when it conducts competitions.

In case of all private institutions these restrictions are more stringent, prohibiting the use of such national titles until approval from the Government is obtained.

COMPLIANCE AND CONSEQUENCES

The BCI has emphasized the importance of immediate compliance with these guidelines. Failure to do so will result in serious consequences. Institutions that violate the directive may face:

  • Revocation of recognition by the BCI.
  • Legal action under the Emblems Act.
  • Disqualification from conducting further moot court competitions.

The directive ensures that moot court competitions are conducted transparently, and that sponsorships are not gained on false pretenses.

OBSERVATION

The BCI’s directive is a progressive move in promoting integrity and transparency at the law school competitions. By limiting the use of national titles, the BCI seeks to safeguard the public and participants against such malpractice and maintain the respectability of legal contests in India. Now, Institutions, especially private law colleges appear to be more careful in promoting their competitions and advertising them in a lawful manner as the consequences can be drastic.

For more information or queries, please email us at

[email protected]

Key Contact

Surendra Singh Chandrawat

Managing Partner