On March 7, 2025, the Supreme Court of India addressed the ongoing legal dispute concerning the redevelopment of Mumbai’s Dharavi slum. The case, SecLink Technologies Corporation vs. The State of Maharashtra, revolves around allegations of unfair exclusion from the bidding process for the ₹5,000
On March 3, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a pivotal judgment in C. Kamalakkannan vs. State of Tamil Nadu, a case that not only examined the intricacies of criminal law but also raised important questions about the use of confessional statements, circumstantial evidence, and the fundamental rights
On March 5, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered an important judgment in the criminal appeal case of Jitendra Mohan Shukla vs. State of Uttar Pradesh. The Court examined the sufficiency of evidence used to convict Jitendra Mohan Shukla under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the alleged
On March 4, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered an important judgment in the case of M.S. Nagabhushan vs. D.S. Nagaraja, addressing the enforceability of post-dated cheques and the legal nuances surrounding contractual obligations under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
The Supreme Court of India delivered a notable judgment in the case Rajnish Singh @ Soni vs. State of Uttar Pradesh. This appeal was filed against the State of Uttar Pradesh, involving serious allegations of unlawful detainment and coercion. The case brought important questions to the forefront regarding
The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment that reinforced the rights of landlords in tenancy disputes, specifically concerning the eviction of tenants based on bona fide need. This ruling, which is significant in the realm of landlord-tenant relationships, clarifies the legal position regarding
On February 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Radhika Agarwal vs. Union of India and Others (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 336 of 2018), addressing the constitutional validity and application of arrest provisions under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act, 2017 and the Customs Act, 1962.
On February 26, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in favor of retired government employees by ruling that pensionary benefits cannot be denied to an employee solely due to unauthorized absence from duty unless it is established that the absence involves an offense of moral turpitude. This judgment holds significant importance as it addresses the long-standing issue of withholding pensionary benefits for various reasons, including absences and other forms of misconduct.
The Supreme Court of India delivered a crucial judgment, refusing to entertain a petition that challenged the fees and incidental charges levied by the Bar Council of India (BCI) for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). The petitioners had raised concerns that the Bar Council's fee of Rs. 3,500 for the examination violated a previous Supreme Court ruling regarding the regulation of fees. In its judgment, the Court highlighted the importance of enabling the Bar Council of India to generate revenue to sustain its operations, rather than restricting its ability to manage its financial resources.
On February 24, 2025, the Supreme Court of India rendered a landmark judgment in the case Md. Bani Alam Mazid vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, acquitting Md. Bani Alam Mazid, who had been convicted of murder and sentenced to death. This judgment, after an extensive legal battle spanning over two decades, underscores the critical importance of upholding the principles of justice, fairness, and the presumption of innocence in the criminal justice system.