A notable defamation case happened recently which affected many well-known personalities including the Chief Minister of Delhi. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, the judge of the Delhi High Court upheld a trial court’s order summoning Arvind Kejriwal in a
Revisiting The Decision In “Nargesh Meerza”: Justice Nagarathna’s Call For A Re-Evaluation In the dynamic landscape of India, the journey towards gender equality has been both arduous and transformative. Women across the nation have been breaking barriers, challenging stereotypes, and redefining traditional roles. However, amidst these strides,…
In a landmark judgment of Shailesh Kumar v. State of UP, the Supreme Court of India has clarified and strengthened the rights of an accused person during cross-examination. The ruling states that whenever a police officer refers to a case diary to refresh their memory
Home > Insights > Legal Battle: SC's Verdict on Patanjali’s Marketing MisstepsDate:…
In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court of India has delivered a resounding message against frivolous litigation and the mistreatment of underprivileged individuals. The case, The State of Rajasthan v. Gopal Bijawat, involved a poor labourer who endured over two
In a digital age where crimes transcend geographical boundaries with ease, the issue of jurisdiction in law enforcement becomes increasingly complex. Recently, the Kerala High Court in Noel Joseph v State of Kerala took a significant step in addressing this challenge
In the intricate tapestry of India’s legal landscape, the institution of marriage holds profound significance, not only culturally and socially but also legally. However, amidst the rich diversity of marital unions, there lurks a troubling trend in the rise of fraudulen
On February 15, 2024, the Supreme Court of India unanimously declared the Electoral Bond Scheme (“EBS”) unconstitutional, marking a monumental shift in India’s political landscape. This blog delves into the multifaceted dimensions of this landmark judgment
The recent judgment by the Delhi High Court in Debarati Nandee v Union of India & Anr + Connected matters on the adoption of children has sparked debate and introspection. The court ruled that “the right to adopt is not a fundamental right” and upheld regulations
The High Court is not prohibited from exercising its inherent jurisdiction and could still determine whether or not the crimes claimed to have been committed were made out in the first place based on the First Information Report (“FIR”), charge sheet, and other documents